MiniMoo
Beyond A Reasonable Doubt
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2016
- Messages
- 777
- Reaction score
- 3,912
How was it "clean"?
If it's the lack of DNA you are referring to, the elements helped tremendously.
JMO
And yet there was blood...
JMO MOO JMT
How was it "clean"?
If it's the lack of DNA you are referring to, the elements helped tremendously.
JMO
Obviously, "yes".Question: Would an alcoholic be able to leave a crime scene so clean?
And yet there was blood...
JMO MOO JMT
Your post reminded me of the press conferences.IMO, I think she recognized that photo of BG as being her spouse - RA.
I think she asked him about it and he denied having been on the bridge at all that day. "That's not me Kathy; I wasn't on the bridge that day, I was only on the trail". (The photo is obviously taken on the bridge - one can see the bridge clearly).
Kathy believes him and encourages him to talk to LE because he was on the trails. RA himself stated that he came forward at the encouragement of his wife ... Had it not been for her, he wouldn't have said a darn thing about it or tipped himself in IMO. But he was caught out by her so he had to.
She knows he's talked to LE ... and life goes on swimmingly for 5 long years. So, in reality she's had 5 years to believe him as there has been zero repercussions to his chat with LE.
Than, BAM, they find themselves being questionned - RA is now a POI and her reaction is, "But you told me that you weren't on the bridge Richard". With this statement she has indicated that she had queried him about that photo - about it being him. He denied it. She believed him for 5 years. Where she's at now is another ball game.
He played her. KA was another of RA's victims ... at least for 5 long years.
And, the fact that he lied to her about being on the bridge that day, despite admitting to LE that he was on platform one of that bridge is yet just another bit of "guilty knowledge" on RAs part.
IMO.
Is that ET?
I wonder too if the pixelation of the video and public speculation turning attention towards RL, TK, KK, JC and others could have helped with this too?RA's wife must be going thru excruciating cognitive dissonance... it's striking that she said to him in the interrogation room 'you told me you weren't on the bridge' !!
So she didn't understand that the BG pic is him even tho MOO it plainly is .... & as he tipped himself in after the pic came out, imo HE recognized himself in it.
She knew he was at the scene, could not possibly have avoided seeing the BG pic, & yet somehow she thought it was not him !! Mindblowing
MOO
The trail timeline to identify Richard Allen as Bridge guy is absolutely key here and I just don't think the prosecution are doing enough to get their facts across to the jury.
The fact a day or so after the murders he said he was there between 13:30 & 15:30. But 5 (FIVE!) years later he changed that time frame to much earlier. Ask yourselves what is likely to be the more vivid memory? Days after or multiple years?
No photos in court showing the perspective Betsy Blair would've had from her vantage point to the first platform. It was about 100 yards wasn't it. Very difficult to give an age approximation from that distance. She did so anyway and the defense have been hanging on it.
As far as I can see they haven't presented exactly where the group of girls saw him on the trail and I also think at trial they didn't ask the witnesses from that group in which direction he was travelling?
When asked in 2022 if he had ever crossed the full length of the bridge on previous trips to the trails he said it was treacherous and not something he had done for years. The girls were murdered 'years' before this interview!
There are many more details that haven't been mentioned imo.
The prosecution are really showing a lack of thorough investigation to me.
They are tiny details, but in the scheme of things put together they are huge ...but I don't get the impression the prosecution are getting it across.
Meh. They stated that to BW while he was on the stand last week too and he flat out denied it, "that's just not true!" and further stated that the ATMs were in the morning and that he just dropped off a trailer after work.@defense_diaries
#RichardAllenTrial UpdateMonday morning and the trial is about to get started. Seems likely that the Defense will be calling Brad Weber to the stand today. Brad Weber has become a critical witness for the State’s new theory that #RichardAllen saw Weber’s van at approximately 2:32 p.m. on 2/13/17 and it spooked him causing him to abandon his plan to S.A. the girls. Problem for the State is that Weber had made a prior inconsistent statement to FBI Agent Pohl early on in the investigation stating that he has serviced multiple ATM machines after he clocked out at 2:02 p.m., which had him arriving home after 3:10 p.m. on 2/13. The defense filed a motion on 11/1/24 to allow Agent Pohl to testify remotely this past Saturday from Texas as he has a medical condition which prohibits him from flying. Judge Gull denied the motion. The defense now has the challenging task of trying to impeach their own witness. Stay tuned.
8:30 AM · Nov 4, 2024
It is the last part that is strange. If Richard Allen walked back to his car after the crimes and he stayed off the trails, the only other way he could get back to his car is by walking in the woods, but off the road so between the trail path and the road.RE WHITE van
Allen, according to Wala's note, said he intended to rape the girls, but he didn't because he saw a white van driving nearby. Instead, he crossed Deer Creek, killed them and left, avoiding the main trails as he walked back to his car.
Defense calls first 2 witnesses after state rests its case in Delphi murders trial
In my opinion, yes. He was dressed in layers. He may have had gloves on. The crime scene wasn’t clean. He left behind a bullet from his gun and a cell phone that had incriminating evidence on it. He was spotted by multiple witnesses.Question: Would an alcoholic be able to leave a crime scene so clean?
Also (not sure if this has been addressed earlier) do we know the size of the beers he consumed? I don't drink beer but a quick Google shows that beer comes in can sizes ranging from 7.5oz - 32 oz.Alcoholics often skip meals before drinking so they can get a buzz quicker
. I think he left his mom’s house in a rush so he could start his nefarious plans and complete them and hide the evidence before KA returned home from work. This would also explain why he was seen walking with a purpose.
Also I am wondering if skipping meals in Westville is as also done purposefully to help him achieve a “high or altered state” faster.
Jmo
If so, wouldn't it had showed up in the geofence thingy? It doesn't sound like it did. So my guess is there wasn't another phone over.It is very odd and the reason I think the girls had another phone that they handed over to him.
In my experience alcoholism can change the facial appearance. Especially the nose and cheeks.I wonder too if the pixelation of the video and public speculation turning attention towards RL, TK, KK, JC and others could have helped with this too?
One of the things about the video that I did appreciate is how well defined BG’s clothes are compared to his face due to the pixelation. The clothes IMO fortunately played a big role in identifying and matching witness statements regarding what BG looked liked that day and maybe tracking his movements. At the same time the outfit was also pretty common and unfortunately it may have been one of the reasons that led some members of the public to begin suspect or target negative attention towards RL, who was innocent by the way, because he wore a jacket that appeared similar to BG’s during one of his earlier interviews.
As for BG’s face, due to the pixelation, I used to perceive the nose as bit more blunt or thick, like JC’s or KK’s, who are also not suspects of this horrific crime, compared to YBG sketch and RA’s profile.
I guess my point overall was that I think maybe it is easier and feels safer for the brain and eyes to see similarities that allude multiple dangerous elements outside the outside the home than one sitting next to you everyday. Like despite your instincts or personal doubt there is a comfort and further encouragement that with all the fingers pointing at POIs none of them have yet to point at you or your spouse/partner