- Joined
- Sep 13, 2003
- Messages
- 31,530
- Reaction score
- 54,543
Be sure and vote in our latest Delpho poll
Click here
Click here
rsbmA deputy did miss seeing Abby & Libby during an initial search.
jmo
I can imagine him curling up at the crime scene in a fetal position (like he had done in more harmless situations also), digging in the dirt and crying about, what he had done to the girls, especially to Abby. That would also explain the mud on his clothes. The girls weren't muddy, afaik, so why should he have been muddy. Would explain also the long time, he spent at the crime scene. MOOAnd I find the he was disturbed from his initial attempts where he wanted to SA them and decides he has to kill them, so he takes them down and embankment, across the creek, up another embankment, makes them strip, redressed one of the girls, puts other clothing in creek, gets sticks and very long cumbersome branches to place carefully by each girl, sets off for home knowing he has to walk on road to get to car, oh and if the jury are to accept the muddy bloody witness he waited over time an hour after killing them if the states theory is to be believed,
If disturbed he either kills them near to where they were or he runs away, he doesn't do all those other things because he could be disturbed and seen again
And I really don't accept the idea that he intended to rape the girls in the area they were at bottom of hill, it was broad daylight anybody could have walked down the hill and seen them
This was a deliberate choice to leave them how they were left, posed as they were, sticks placed not to conceal but holding some meaning to killer,
The defence were hampered by the judge in being able to focus on the weirdness of crime scene, I just hope jury are able to see just how strange the scene is and realise that the way it is has meaning to the killer/s
Would it only be possible to slash one throat at a time for one perp RA? I thought the cuts were somewhat different, ie, multiple slashes on LG severing a carotid artery versus a singular jugular wound on AW? Why didn't the 2nd victim run or fight? I am having trouble visualizing how this went down.Another signature would be the way he killed them, fairly precise slash marks across their throats.
Out of all the cases I’ve followed, I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything like that when a sharp weapon was used.
That’s why a box cutter is perfect to me, as I’d expect stab wounds with a knife.
I did those last week because we just painted our main floor. However we do have another floor with tons of baseboards!Feeling you on that! Baseboards are next![]()
![]()
Libby was initially some distance away from Abby. It appears she did run at some point, but didn’t make it far. I think she was slashed at around the same time as Abby, and then he caught up to her and inflicted further wounds (which is why she had more of them).Would it only be possible to slash one throat at a time for one perp RA? I thought the cuts were somewhat different, ie, multiple slashes on LG severing a carotid artery versus a singular jugular wound on AW? Why didn't the 2nd victim run or fight? I am having trouble visualizing how this went down.
Did I draw any conclusions in that conversation?But you can’t conclude that it’s RA just because eyewitness testimony is unreliable. The state has the high burden of proof, and this is definitely a bad fact for the state.
I’m hopeful that it’s just one or two who are at odds and maybe they can come to agreement- because if it’s like 50/50 then that’s a bigger problem- mooJury dismissed for the day, anyone else coming around to the fact that we are looking at a hung jury?
Yeah, maybe it's stressful in there. IDK.So for people who have jury watched before is it at all strange they are putting in so few hours at this juncture considering they have been away from their families for 3 weeks?
I would have personally been eager to get home and would be doing 8am-8pm if needed. I am just trying to understand the logic here. I am genuinely surprised that they went home so early today and wondering how normal this is?
IMO
No.Jury dismissed for the day, anyone else coming around to the fact that we are looking at a hung jury?
Honestly I think that there are going to be major differences in opinion and if things are deadlock to the point that a juror(s) is being inflexible- I’d personally want to cut it short too- 12 hrs of “did not/did too!”So for people who have jury watched before is it at all strange they are putting in so few hours at this juncture considering they have been away from their families for 3 weeks?
I would have personally been eager to get home and would be doing 8am-8pm if needed. I am just trying to understand the logic here. I am genuinely surprised that they went home so early today and wondering how normal this is?
IMO
There may have been something there, however KK deleted data from his devices prior to his interview with Vido at Grissom AFB, which was, if IIRC, in 2020 & prior to RA’s arrest. Also, IIRC, Vido stated said data was just before and after the murders. With that being said & barring someone else opening their mouth, that link is most likely gone for good.What are the odds that Libby and Abby have a connection to the KK catfishing...and RA? Does anyone else find it unusual? How did those 2 predators both find and connect with L and A? Admittedly I have not been glued to this case or the trial so I miss a lot.
I was thinking the time they can deliberate was flexible, but now I am wondering if it's fixed and that is what it is. I do wonder if transporting Richard Allen is a consideration. If they deliberate until say 7 or 8pm and then have to transport him later back to the jail would that be more of a security risk? They have been leaving exactly on schedule and I would think even once in the last 3 days if it was allowed to stay later, they would have. It could be a staffing thing since they are sequestered and needing the staff to move them back and forth to the hotel and the staff to transport RA and secure the courthouse. This case is a big different than others with the level of attention it has. I wonder if there is a simple explanation such as this.So for people who have jury watched before is it at all strange they are putting in so few hours at this juncture considering they have been away from their families for 3 weeks?
I would have personally been eager to get home and would be doing 8am-8pm if needed. I am just trying to understand the logic here. I am genuinely surprised that they went home so early today and wondering how normal this is?
IMO