- Joined
- May 6, 2016
- Messages
- 3,137
- Reaction score
- 28,317
I hope so. I remember when it first happened and we all were saying let today be the day and hoping LE was just playing 3-dimensional chess to secure a conviction. And here we are. /s
I hope so. I remember when it first happened and we all were saying let today be the day and hoping LE was just playing 3-dimensional chess to secure a conviction. And here we are. /s
I think they want to be thorough with whatever decision they make, because they don’t want to sentence an innocent man to life without parole, nor do they want to let a killer free. It’s not a light decision and I don’t envy their positions here.The more time that passes the more I’m thinking a hung jury. There is no way it will be Not guilty as its quite clearly him so there is only two options.
imo
Question, if the jury finds RA not guilty, how do you think the public will react?I mean no disrespect to the Jury at ALL. I wonder if they are gathering information and want to be prepared as possible to speak to the media. I imagine they will be hounded relentlessly, maybe they are also making media plans with each other, I again am not saying they are trying to profit or anything, just maybe making plans to all go to a remote cabin, or deciding what they will or will not be speaking about.
I think (and expect) the public will accept the decision and move on.Question, if the jury finds RA not guilty, how do you think the public will react?
:::: Praying for each jury member:::::I hope so. I remember when it first happened and we all were saying let today be the day and hoping LE was just playing 3-dimensional chess to secure a conviction. And here we are. /s
I understand. I have never walked their shoes so I wouldn't total understand all they are going thru.While living in a hotel room away from their families. I really don't get it when people imply the jury doesn't put in enough time.
jmo
I sure hope soI understand. I have never walked their shoes so I wouldn't total understand all they are going thru.
Do I fear a split? Not necessarily. In my own opinion the days they have deliberated so far, they have started late and finished early so it doesn't seem to indicate a split. Because, really, you would think they would keep the debate going if they were very divided?
I think they already know but want to just go through things to make doubly sure since it's a man's future in the balance but that's just my thoughts.
Same in Robert Telles trial and the Ashley Benefield trial, several weeks ago. Both came back guilty after being sent back to carry on with their deliberations.I watched a trial about a week or so ago (Melody Farris) where the Judge read the Allen charge (go back and deliberate). It worked. It wasn't long (an hour or so, IIRC) and the jury was back with a guilty verdict on all counts.
jmo
ETA: Link to WS thread about the case/trial
Authorities are collecting evidence on property in Cherokee County just north of Milton after human remains were found, law enforcement officials said Saturday.
The residence is on the 2000 block of Purcell Lane, Cherokee County Sheriff’s Office spokeswoman Marianne Kelley said in a news release. Kelley said the remains were located in a wooded area to the rear of the residence by owners of the property.Deputies arrived sometime Friday morning, and police remained at the scene Saturday. The property includes a pond, a creek, several pastures and an extensive amount of wooded...
- Gardener1850
- Replies: 692
- Forum: Identified!
Thank you, guess it makes sense.<modsnip - quoted post was removed for bashing the judge. Following refers to sending jurors back in to deliberate more when they are hung>
It is a common practice…to try to get the jurors to agree before declaring a mistrial.
Hmmm, maybe Judge Gull is on to something.Same in Robert Telles trial and the Ashley Benefield trial, several weeks ago. Both came back guilty after being sent back to carry on with their deliberations.
Because the world is crazy and full of unkind people who track others down to their homes for clicks. That would be reason enough, imo.
This video is painful.Timestamp 39.45 in Lauren's video for a sketch of a photo shown in court, and explanation of Livor Mortis on Abby's body (for anyone interested)
I think so.
Thank you for this.This video is painful.
A lot of information from the ME that I had not heard before.
Abby had dirt and debris on her back, under her clothes. I don't like my conclusion.
More information from the ME about the marks on her chin, possible restraint.
Libby had superficial wounds on her neck. (Threats maybe?) Each cut (gaping wound) had multiple passes. He describes the wounds like perhaps a blade handle going in too far. She was covered in blood, her hands covered in blood. 5 to 10 minutes for each to die.
Absolute mad man.
JMO