I find it very inetersting how the Defence, again with "no new evidence", suddenly finds time differences to be "correlative":
1) 1532hrs the Girl's phone stops moving - 1544hrs arrival of BW's van equals 12 minutes BUT:
"There's NO correlation!! It's too much time difference!! RA can't be the murderer!!"
You know, even though neither of the above pings is actually RA himself nor bear any bearing at he was doing from 1532-1544 and every single minute in between. Thankfully, the jury has affirmed what he was doing, or getting set to do, at that time.
2) 2213hrs RL's phone receives a text message - 1532hrs the Girl's phone stops moving equals 19 minutes SO:
"OMG - This correlates!! This is too close a timing so it means RL actually did the murders!!".
When, in reality it all equals:
OMG!! RL got a text the night of the day the girls were killed, hours after they were killed. I bet LE even knows from whom the text came as we already know that RL was fully investigated as a potential suspect and CLEARED.
OMG!!! "In the area where A&L were found!!" Of course it was. His home is up at the top of the hill from where their bodies were found on his property.
Alternatively in a purple haze universe, maybe the text was "dammit RL, I forgot to unlug my earphones from A&L's phone jack!! Can 'ya wander down 'yer hill and snag them back for me?"" RL then heads down the hill (no flashlight or anything to see with remember as searchers were still out) and stands over Libby for 19 minutes contemplating exactly how he's going to move her and unplug those headphones without actually moving her or the phone (hmmmm, when did they actally get 'plugged in' for the experts in the crowd???) ....
All JMO ...