GUILTY Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #219

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have seen this before where a defence lawyer gets obsessed with a case and ploughs decades in to an obviously guilty client. Feels like he has got deeply redpilled somehow. Maybe he delved too deeply into Odinsim and ended up convincing himself of it. Or maybe he came to believe the judge really was out to get him. Bizarre.

IMO
can someone explain to me why Baldwin is still filing his frivolous motions? Wasn't Richard Allen assigned new counsel for his appeal phase?

I am of the opinion that Baldwin and RD deserve one another. They both share the same lack of attachment to the truth and both are still looking to capitalize personally off the case. JMO Now RD is mad he didn't get the attention he wanted during trial and has taken to writing to news orgs. 😏
------------------------------
On Feb. 15, FOX59 and CBS4’s Max Lewis received a letter from Ricci Davis. In the letter, the convicted criminal claimed that McLeland ignored his warnings about how he “convicted an innocent man” in Richard Allen.
https://fox59.com/delphi-trial/delphi-murders-the-ricci-davis-letters/
 
can someone explain to me why Baldwin is still filing his frivolous motions? Wasn't Richard Allen assigned new counsel for his appeal phase?

I am of the opinion that Baldwin and RD deserve one another. They both share the same lack of attachment to the truth and both are still looking to capitalize personally off the case. JMO Now RD is mad he didn't get the attention he wanted during trial and has taken to writing to news orgs. 😏
------------------------------
On Feb. 15, FOX59 and CBS4’s Max Lewis received a letter from Ricci Davis. In the letter, the convicted criminal claimed that McLeland ignored his warnings about how he “convicted an innocent man” in Richard Allen.
https://fox59.com/delphi-trial/delphi-murders-the-ricci-davis-letters/
I am of the opinion that he’s trying to get things on the record which weren’t allowed or the defense didn’t get around to addressing for whatever reason. 100% sour grapes.

MOO
 
This article states they were going to do the motion to correct errors first.

Oh I know what Baldwin said. But the endless arguing over MTCE should not in any way stop or stay the deadline to file notice of appeal. MOO According to this article that time frame was within 30 days from sentencing. Sentencing was what? December 20? We are well past he deadline to file that notice and I haven't seen it reported that got filed?

so what gives?
 
Oh I know what Baldwin said. But the endless arguing over MTCE should not in any way stop or stay the deadline to file notice of appeal. MOO According to this article that time frame was within 30 days from sentencing. Sentencing was what? December 20? We are well past he deadline to file that notice and I haven't seen it reported that got filed?

so what gives?
I have no idea, but if the MTCE hasn't somehow stopped the clock on that, then RA will have every right to feel like he's been let down by his counsel. If they've been spending all their time writing pointless motions when they should have been filing his appeal, he's going to be in deep, deep legal trouble. And I honestly don't know if he has any recourse. (IANAL)

MOO
 
Oh I know what Baldwin said. But the endless arguing over MTCE should not in any way stop or stay the deadline to file notice of appeal. MOO According to this article that time frame was within 30 days from sentencing. Sentencing was what? December 20? We are well past he deadline to file that notice and I haven't seen it reported that got filed?

so what gives?
The filing of the MTCE gave the appellate attorneys an extra 2-4 weeks or something to that effect. Their clock started ticking when JG denied that, IIRC.

ETA An extra 2-4 weeks on top of the 30 days.
 
Oh I know what Baldwin said. But the endless arguing over MTCE should not in any way stop or stay the deadline to file notice of appeal. MOO According to this article that time frame was within 30 days from sentencing. Sentencing was what? December 20? We are well past he deadline to file that notice and I haven't seen it reported that got filed?

so what gives?
I would ”hope” RA gets a new defence team, otherwise it’s just more of the same (utter bu**).
 
I would ”hope” RA gets a new defence team, otherwise it’s just more of the same (utter bu**).
From my understanding he has 2 appellate attorneys which should be at the forefront once the appeals process kicks in. It’s unclear to me how involved the 3 trial attorneys (AB, BR, JA) will be once that happens. I doubt we’ll hear much from them, at least in terms of filing these types of motions. Fingers crossed. 🤞🤞🤞
 
The filing of the MTCE gave the appellate attorneys an extra 2-4 weeks or something to that effect. Their clock started ticking when JG denied that, IIRC.

ETA An extra 2-4 weeks on top of the 30 days.

Though isn't that just their notice of appeal?

They won't file anything substantive till after they get the record and then plough through all of it.
 
Defense atty Andrew Baldwin is doing what he should be doing, IMO.
28 Pages

V. POST-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS
Rule 5.1. Advisements After Sentencing
(A) Upon entering a conviction, the court must sentence a defendant within thirty days of the plea or the finding or verdict of guilty, unless extended for good cause.
(B) Following the sentencing of a defendant on a conviction, or on a revocation or modification of post-conviction conditions in which the defendant has not waived the right to appeal, the judge must immediately advise the defendant: (1) The defendant is entitled to take an appeal or file a motion to correct error.(2) If the defendant wishes to file a motion to correct error, it must be done within thirty days of the sentencing.(3) If the defendant wishes to take an appeal, the defendant must file a notice of appeal within thirty days after the sentencing or within thirty days after the motion to correct error is denied or deemed denied, if one is filed; if the notice of appeal is not timely filed, the right to appeal may be forfeited.(4) If the defendant is financially unable to employ an attorney, the court will appoint counsel for defendant at public expense for the purpose of taking an appeal.15
(C) After these advisements, the court must inquire whether the defendant wishes to appeal. If the defendant desires an appeal, the court must inquire whether defendant has funds to employ an attorney. If the court finds the defendant who wishes to appeal is financially unable to employ counsel, the court must promptly appoint an attorney to represent the defendant and notify the defendant.
Rule 5.2. Abstract of Judgment
Upon sentencing a person for any felony conviction, the court must complete an abstract of judgment in an electronic format approved by the Indiana Office of Judicial Administration(IOJA). The IOJA will maintain an automated system for purposes of submitting the electronic abstract of judgment.
Rule 5.3. Motion to Correct Error
(A) When Mandatory. A motion to correct error is not a prerequisite for appeal, except when a party seeks to address newly discovered material evidence, including alleged jury misconduct, capable of production within thirty days after the sentencing date which, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered and produced at trial .All other issues and grounds for appeal appropriately preserved during trial may be initially addressed in the appellate brief.
(B) Time for Filing. A motion to correct error, if any, must be filed within thirty days after the date of sentencing, or the date of entry on the chronological case summary of an order of dismissal or an order of acquittal.
Rule 5.4. Time Within Which the Appeal Must be Submitted
The notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the date of entry on the chronological case summary of an order of sentencing, dismissal, or acquittal. However, if a motion to correct error is timely filed pursuant to Rule 5.3, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the ruling on the motion to correct error is entered on the chronological case summary or the motion to correct error is deemed denied under Trial Rule 53.3, whichever occurs earlier.

Rule 2.7. Written Motions and Legal Memoranda
All written motions must include specific contentions supported by cogent reasoning and pertinent legal authorities.(A) Motion to Dismiss. A separate legal memorandum must accompany any motion to dismiss. Additional requirements are prescribed by Ind. Code § 35-34-1-4.
(B) Motion to Suppress. A defendant who seeks to exclude evidence must make a timely objection at trial. To facilitate judicial economy, counsel is also strongly encouraged to file a pretrial motion to suppress at least ten days before a jury trial. Moving counsel must clearly state the items or statements to be suppressed and the basis for the suppression
 
per my notes:

1/9/25 Docket update: Appeal: Notice to Court filed. Acceptance of Appointment & Formal Notice of Appointment of Outside Counsel filed by Allen. Mark Leeman & Stacy Uliana are his appellate attorneys.
thanks @Niner so next defense will need to file their appellate brief in support of the noticed appeal. Wonder what that clock looks like?
 
I have no idea, but if the MTCE hasn't somehow stopped the clock on that, then RA will have every right to feel like he's been let down by his counsel. If they've been spending all their time writing pointless motions when they should have been filing his appeal, he's going to be in deep, deep legal trouble. And I honestly don't know if he has any recourse. (IANAL)

MOO

If RA feels he has been let down by his counsel he has no one to blame but himself.
Judge Gull tried to save him from these blithering incompetents and their cohort, the unethical Ms. Auger, but RA and his entire clueless family insisted they stay.
 
Defense atty Andrew Baldwin is doing what he should be doing, IMO.
28 Pages

V. POST-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS
Rule 5.1. Advisements After Sentencing
(A) Upon entering a conviction, the court must sentence a defendant within thirty days of the plea or the finding or verdict of guilty, unless extended for good cause.
(B) Following the sentencing of a defendant on a conviction, or on a revocation or modification of post-conviction conditions in which the defendant has not waived the right to appeal, the judge must immediately advise the defendant: (1) The defendant is entitled to take an appeal or file a motion to correct error.(2) If the defendant wishes to file a motion to correct error, it must be done within thirty days of the sentencing.(3) If the defendant wishes to take an appeal, the defendant must file a notice of appeal within thirty days after the sentencing or within thirty days after the motion to correct error is denied or deemed denied, if one is filed; if the notice of appeal is not timely filed, the right to appeal may be forfeited.(4) If the defendant is financially unable to employ an attorney, the court will appoint counsel for defendant at public expense for the purpose of taking an appeal.15
(C) After these advisements, the court must inquire whether the defendant wishes to appeal. If the defendant desires an appeal, the court must inquire whether defendant has funds to employ an attorney. If the court finds the defendant who wishes to appeal is financially unable to employ counsel, the court must promptly appoint an attorney to represent the defendant and notify the defendant.
Rule 5.2. Abstract of Judgment
Upon sentencing a person for any felony conviction, the court must complete an abstract of judgment in an electronic format approved by the Indiana Office of Judicial Administration(IOJA). The IOJA will maintain an automated system for purposes of submitting the electronic abstract of judgment.
Rule 5.3. Motion to Correct Error
(A) When Mandatory. A motion to correct error is not a prerequisite for appeal, except when a party seeks to address newly discovered material evidence, including alleged jury misconduct, capable of production within thirty days after the sentencing date which, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered and produced at trial .All other issues and grounds for appeal appropriately preserved during trial may be initially addressed in the appellate brief.
(B) Time for Filing. A motion to correct error, if any, must be filed within thirty days after the date of sentencing, or the date of entry on the chronological case summary of an order of dismissal or an order of acquittal.
Rule 5.4. Time Within Which the Appeal Must be Submitted
The notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the date of entry on the chronological case summary of an order of sentencing, dismissal, or acquittal. However, if a motion to correct error is timely filed pursuant to Rule 5.3, the notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the ruling on the motion to correct error is entered on the chronological case summary or the motion to correct error is deemed denied under Trial Rule 53.3, whichever occurs earlier.

Rule 2.7. Written Motions and Legal Memoranda
All written motions must include specific contentions supported by cogent reasoning and pertinent legal authorities.(A) Motion to Dismiss. A separate legal memorandum must accompany any motion to dismiss. Additional requirements are prescribed by Ind. Code § 35-34-1-4.
(B) Motion to Suppress. A defendant who seeks to exclude evidence must make a timely objection at trial. To facilitate judicial economy, counsel is also strongly encouraged to file a pretrial motion to suppress at least ten days before a jury trial. Moving counsel must clearly state the items or statements to be suppressed and the basis for the suppression
BBM

The problem is that the MTCE has already been denied yet Baldwin is still trying to get things on the record which they chose not to do during trial. Nothing he has filed has been new, yet he keeps trying to file motion after motion claiming it is. He even went so far to admit this during an interview on DD when he stated that he let the RD stuff slip through the cracks for 7-8 months. They had every opportunity to request more time but they insisted on a speedy trial.

JMO
 
thanks @Niner so next defense will need to file their appellate brief in support of the noticed appeal. Wonder what that clock looks like?
That is the clock which began ticking once the MTCE was denied. Not a lawyer but legal analysts were stating the filing of the MTCE bought the appellate attorneys an additional 15-30 days (pending how the MTCE played out). These latest motions may be more strategic delay tactics combined with attempts at getting additional SODDI people on "the list" for the appeal.

MOO
 
BBM

The problem is that the MTCE has already been denied yet Baldwin is still trying to get things on the record which they chose not to do during trial. Nothing he has filed has been new, yet he keeps trying to file motion after motion claiming it is. He even went so far to admit this during an interview on DD when he stated that he let the RD stuff slip through the cracks for 7-8 months. They had every opportunity to request more time but they insisted on a speedy trial.

JMO
Gull finished the MTCE issue.

RD was uncooperative until after the trial was done. I imagine the D team felt the juice would not be worth the squeeze. I agree that the defense team made mistakes. shrugs... maybe that will help RA will get a new trial.

I'm really sorry so much of this case was kept secret.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
200
Guests online
933
Total visitors
1,133

Forum statistics

Threads
626,003
Messages
18,515,340
Members
240,888
Latest member
Lizzybet
Back
Top