No, it just means it looked like him then & more so now, given the look he’s now sporting, to that particular person doing the observing.
Yes, that would be the literal definition of "in other words" since that is not at all what I stated in the one sentence you kept in what you quoted out of 3 other paragraphs. Thanks for clarifying, I guess??


Let’s see, in other words, you feel the judge was wrong in her suppression of the cell phone evidence & the third party culprits, even though the defense couldn’t legally establish that those things should be admitted into trial? It’s only NM’s & JG’s collusion that the defense couldn’t produce any legal reason or evidence beyond hearsay, in the case of the 3rd party suspects, for those things to be admitted, even though throughout the judge (the colluding one) kept reminding the defense she wasn’t going to allow those suspects if the defense kept beating the same dead horses? Gotcha.
I assume you have links to approved sources backing up what you claim, that NM & JG didn’t allow RA to have an adequate defense - unless that’s just an opinion?
See you again in another couple of months, assuming you keep your recent post patterns, if you don’t respond.
ETA first quote, response & entire 2nd paragraph under 2nd quote