Civilians who provide DNA do so with the protection that that DNA is only used for specific purposes and stored for a limited time.
Their samples aren't all put in a database to be held indefinitely.
MOO
He was on the stand at the time. I do think that all Saturday sessions will be that short, but who knows. I've never followed a case that even had them.Will all of the Saturday sessions be so short?
And why would they ask a deputy that and why would he answer? (Or was he on the stand?)
Trial on a Saturday? Is that out of the ordinary?
Yes, it is, but this jury is sequestered. I assume the court is trying to make the best use of their time to get them home to their lives as soon as they possibly can. There is no court on Sundays.
As to why ask for retesting - All I can think of is if someone (in this case, defense) is questioning the validity of a test, maybe claiming / suspecting records were fudged or incomplete, a new test would be requested.Stupid question incoming....
So, when felons are convicted, then have to provide a DNA sample (in most states? Or all?) that goes into CODIS. During a murder investigation, the same type of system isn't used? Why would these family members (or anyone) even need to provide their DNA more than once?
Just curious.
As always, JMO.
He was on the stand at the time. I do think that all Saturday sessions will be that short, but who knows. I've never followed a case that even had them.
Gee, which weapon will defense claim Richard Allen DID use?
As to why ask for retesting - All I can think of is if someone (in this case, defense) is questioning the validity of a test, maybe claiming / suspecting records were fudged or incomplete, a new test would be requested.
jmo
Yeah, it's an important protection against bad faith use by LE. Good case to illustrate this - there was a rape case. The victim in the case had her DNA taken with her consent when she was processed for that assault. Some LE got the bright idea of taking that sample and using it to compare to suspect DNA from another crime. The DNA matched. She won the case against them because they used her DNA illegally.Ohhh, ok, thank you. I didn't know that.
Those are amongst the things that make me lean towards believing RA is the guy.
But I can so easily put myself into those shoes. Likes to go on walks by self? Check. But likes to do so to listen to music and unwind. Not able to account for when/where I was? Check. But lives alone and doesn't check in/out with anyone. Leaves phone at home, meaning no traceability there? Check. But likes to wear thin workout clothes without the extra weight. Works in the community and people seem to like me? Check. But also a very quiet, cautious dude.
I get there are plenty of reasons why RA is looking guilty.
There are just so many "Check...but"s that I can place myself into. I just really, really hope the state has the goods. More than what we know so far...because: was I at spotted leaving my apartment on security footage 15 minutes ago? Check...but..."
More than likely, that hair was analyzed years ago, wasn't Abby or Libby's but probably had a lot in common with Libby's. No need to test further.From what Barbara MacDonald said on CourtTV LIVE is that the State were scrambling to get it tested.
May not be all worked out just yet.
Mightn't be relevant, but it might be as well.
BTW: The unspent bullet has never been tested with LE ones as it was brought up by Baldwin today.
JMO MOO JMT
All of these people committed to attending this trial every day are going to lose so much weight. i don't know whether to be jealous or pray harder! I would not be able to handle these long days with no water or food. But especially water!
As always, JMO.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.