- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 29,118
- Reaction score
- 683,336
“Studies of proven false confessors have shown that, even in cases involving confessions later proven to be false, juries convict in 73-81% of the cases.”
We haven’t even heard what RA said while confessing yet the insinuation is his confessions must be false?
Indiana law allows for it, and one would assume it would be a violation of law not to allow for it. I'm no fan of judge gull, especially when it comes to the restrictions placed on the media, but the rulings have been predictable ones based on the law (sketches for instance).I'm so glad, and pleasantly surprised, that Judge Gull is allowing questions from the jury.
As always, JMO.
<modsnip>“Studies of proven false confessors have shown that, even in cases involving confessions later proven to be false, juries convict in 73-81% of the cases.”
Indiana law allows for it, and one would assume it would be a violation of law not to allow for it. I'm no fan of judge gull, especially when it comes to the restrictions placed on the media, but the rulings have been predictable ones based on the law (sketches for instance).
Just a few bullet points from that source.
- Since the late 1980s, six studies alone have documented approximately 250 interrogation-induced false confessions.
- False confessions make for the leading cause of wrongful convictions in homicide cases.
- More than two-thirds of the DNA-cleared homicide cases documented by the Innocence Project were caused by false confessions.
- In about 30% of DNA exoneration cases, innocent defendants made incriminating statements, delivered outright confessions or pled guilty.
- Multiple false confessions to the same crime were obtained in 30% of the cases, wherein one false confession was used to prompt others.
![]()
The Truth about False Confessions - Prisons and Justice Initiative
Above are some of the moments from our event “The Truth About False Confessions” held on Tuesday, March 22. Watch the full event and read a description below. Most people instinctively believe that only guilty people confess. But a great deal of both academic research and empirical evidence...prisonsandjustice.georgetown.edu
Indiana law allows for it, and one would assume it would be a violation of law not to allow for it. I'm no fan of judge gull, especially when it comes to the restrictions placed on the media, but the rulings have been predictable ones based on the law (sketches for instance).
Psychological/mental health issues are often involved in false confessions. So I don’t understand, when RA was confessing to anyone and everyone who would listen for weeks and weeks, why his D team basically ignored him rather than seek physiological intervention. What kind of responsible lawyers don’t even try to protect their client when it becomes obvious he is doing something that stands a strong chance of getting him convicted the minute RA’s wife informed them? This suggests to me they’ve never really believed or could care a less in his innocence and are in it just to seek attention. JMO
Great point.Why would the defense care about what people on social media think? The jury is sequestered and the trial has started.
JMO
They tried numerous times to get his out of there.Psychological/mental health issues are often involved in false confessions. So I don’t understand, when RA was confessing to anyone and everyone who would listen for weeks and weeks, why his D team basically ignored him rather than seek physiological intervention. What kind of responsible lawyers don’t even try to protect their client when it becomes obvious he is doing something that stands a strong chance of getting him convicted the minute his wife informed them? This suggests to me they’ve never really believed or could care a less in his innocence and are in it just to seek attention. JMO
I was just providing you with statistics on false confessions, which you asked about. I don't know if they are false or not. We'll hear about them before this is over.Psychological/mental health issues are often involved in false confessions. So I don’t understand, when RA was confessing to anyone and everyone who would listen for weeks and weeks, why his D team basically ignored him rather than seek physiological intervention. What kind of responsible lawyers don’t even try to protect their client when it becomes obvious he is doing something that stands a strong chance of getting him convicted the minute his wife informed them? This suggests to me they’ve never really believed or could care a less in his innocence and are in it just to seek attention. JMO
This doesn’t make any sense, where does it state that anyone thought the bodies were mannequins? People were searching for two missing girls and then found two bodies covered in blood I understand they would be shocked to see that but I highly doubt anyone thought they were dolls.
JMO
I was just providing you with statistics on false confessions, which you asked about. I don't know if they are false or not. We'll hear about them before this is over.
What’s the conviction rate in all trials that go to juries? You usually don’t want to be the defendent in a case going to trial because the overall odds are not in your favor.“Studies of proven false confessors have shown that, even in cases involving confessions later proven to be false, juries convict in 73-81% of the cases.”
Why?Yep, trying to get around the press pool rules.
I don't see this being allowed to continue.
They're either guests or press. Fish or fowl. They'll have to choose.
MOO