Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #210

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think this might be it, but can't map it out. Every time I try - Freedom bridge comes up for some reason.

Question: Is the bridge still there or are both bridges right next to one another or something?

If you don't know, you don't have to answer.

But I think this is it so thank you!

JMO MOO JMT

It is part of Canal Park west of Freedom Bridge.
 
I am not a defense attorney, but my husband is.

We don’t really know the content of the whole conversation or whether that confession to Wala was stated in a coherent and logical manner.
The problem for the D is, imo, that RA spoke to his mother and wife in a very coherent and logical manner. So I don't see why I would doubt his ability to do so with his therapist.

Why haven't The D called out the details in Wala's version of the confession as false? Or have they? Hard to keep track these days.
This is not one of the recorded “confessions.” All we have is Wala’s retelling, and I find her to be unreliable because of her stake in the case and the way she testified (waffling on whether RA was severely impaired or only faking it for some unspecified secondary gain).

I don't have full faith in her either, as she was very unprofessional and erratic. But I don't think she was lying about the confession. IMO
 
I believe the jury was played both the original unedited version & the cleaned up versions of the video. A person giving testimony as to what they believe they hear (or see or think or smell) is in no way instructing the jury. Not everything presented as evidence is an undeniable fact. That’s Hollywood court fiction.

JMO
The D filed a motion before the video from Lg’s phone was played to prevent witnesses opining about what the audio said. I don’t know if JG had ruled on it before it was played or not does anyone know? This isn’t moo it’s a question.

Link to article about aforementioned motion in limine:


If she did not rule before the video was played, why not? If she did, what was her ruling? Does anyone know?
 
The D filed a motion before the video from Lg’s phone was played to prevent witnesses opining about what the audio said. I don’t know if JG had ruled on it before it was played or not does anyone know? This isn’t moo it’s a question.

Link to article about aforementioned motion in limine:


If she did not rule before the video was played, why not? If she did, what was her ruling? Does anyone know?
I honestly don’t know. It would be a bit of a surprise to me if JG was caught with her britches down on something like this, but you never know…doubtful but I’m not one that digs into matters as such. I trust everyone to do their jobs. If she didn’t, I’d have expected an uproar from the defense (and their mouthpieces).

JMO
 
The state = the public.
Yes and the public includes RA. The judge works for all in the case...within and by the law. An all encompassing job. That was my point of contention. The people may be prosecuting RA within the judge's courtroom but the judge is also looking after his interests. She has no bias. MO
 
The problem for the D is, imo, that RA spoke to his mother and wife in a very coherent and logical manner. So I don't see why I would doubt his ability to do so with his therapist.

Why haven't The D called out the details in Wala's version of the confession as false? Or have they? Hard to keep track these days.


I don't have full faith in her either, as she was very unprofessional and erratic. But I don't think she was lying about the confession. IMO
Dr. Wala corroborated what RA had already said himself, to his family and many others.

He killed Abigal Williams and Liberty German.
images.jpeg-2.jpg
 
Was the entire video played for the jury? Was BG’s voice determined to be RA’s?
Only via opinions of some witnesses on the stand as far as I know - not proven with any sort of forensics or software that I’m aware of. Moo. In three words on the video I don’t think any meaningful comparison can be made. Mooo
 
If I were a juror, and I saw all of this....
I would come to the conclusion his guilty conscience got the best of him. moo

 
Good question for her when the defense puts her on the stand which I believe they will be doing. IMO
She's already testified to the van under oath being from RA's confession. Maybe they'll just play one of these supposed years' old videos or show an R-thread from years ago to prove it was public domain info about a "white van" if she denies it to impeach her?? I see a video from 2 years ago talking about a white van parked up by the transfer station during the helicopter footage (14 Feb), but certainly not driving up that private driveway on 13 Feb 2017.

I do wonder if one of the D-Team surrogate youtubers/DoD R-posters ever brought it up before RA actually confessed to it; then the D-Team can explain how info managed to get leaked once again despite the gag order. IMO.

IMO - not holding my breath to see the D-Team pull up any of that SM as "proof" ...
 
Yes and the public includes RA. The judge works for all in the case...within and by the law. An all encompassing job. That was my point of contention. The people may be prosecuting RA within the judge's courtroom but the judge is also looking after his interests. She has no bias. MO

Well she's an elected official, and up for re-election in 2 years.

I'm not sure I can say with a straight face that the rulings have been fair thus far, considering the history between Judge and DT.

Interestingly Gull was a proponent of the pilot program for televising trials.
 
Only via opinions of some witnesses on the stand as far as I know - not proven with any sort of forensics or software that I’m aware of. Moo. In three words on the video I don’t think any meaningful comparison can be made. Mooo
I do.
MOO Its short, but sounds very much the same.
 
Letting the jury see what the normal seeming man at the defense table is capable of when thwarted or under stress by showing terrifying and cringy prison behavior seems lile a bad strategy.

I think they were shown the treatment he endured at the prison.

Per LL multiple jurors were wiping away tears whilst watching.
 
She's already testified to the van under oath being from RA's confession. Maybe they'll just play one of these supposed years' old videos or show an R-thread from years ago to prove it was public domain info about a "white van" if she denies it to impeach her?? I see a video from 2 years ago talking about a white van parked up by the transfer station during the helicopter footage (14 Feb), but certainly not driving up that private driveway on 13 Feb 2017.

I do wonder if one of the D-Team surrogate youtubers/DoD R-posters ever brought it up before RA actually confessed to it; then the D-Team can explain how info managed to get leaked once again despite the gag order. IMO.

IMO - not holding my breath to see the D-Team pull up any of that SM as "proof" ...
IIRC The vehicle by the transfer station was a box truck.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
107
Guests online
697
Total visitors
804

Forum statistics

Threads
625,726
Messages
18,508,693
Members
240,835
Latest member
Freud
Back
Top