Thx for posting this one—I foolishly only linked to one of the animations for this case.Here is a thread on WS on his crime scene animations:
Crime Scene Animation by Websleuths Member grayhuze
Thx for posting this one—I foolishly only linked to one of the animations for this case.Here is a thread on WS on his crime scene animations:
Crime Scene Animation by Websleuths Member grayhuze
Might be a bit difficult when medicated to express anything.
What was it - Prozac.
Link: Emotional Blunting
JMO MOO JMT
Thank you for this insight.Many many years of Prozac experience in this household with many members, at all doses.
Emotional blunting is not removal of all emotions. It's a dampening down of the extremes. And a dampening of how you feel doesn't prevent you from making a conscious effort to express emotions. And he has been displaying emotions in the courtroom--shaking his head fiercly at LE testimony, smiling at his family and attorneys and happy over his coffee.
I'm curious about the statistics or even confirmed numbers of wrongful convictions in the USA and worldwide.
How many have claimed they were innocent and yet were wrongfully convicted.
I wonder.
JMO MOO JMT
I don't think this applies to worldwide, but might answer part of your question.
Closer to 11 hours if they start at 9amThat was an interesting read!
There is this quote, I believe, that Martin Luther King Jr said that would apply to the situation rather well.
But I do digress...
Just over 10 hours until the deliberations start again...
JMO MOO JMT
He does have an alibi. Per RA, he was at the crime scene.
I bet they are very over it by now and just want to come to some sort of resolution. Moo.That was an interesting read!
There is this quote, I believe, that Martin Luther King Jr said that would apply to the situation rather well.
But I do digress...
Just over 10 hours until the deliberations start again...
JMO MOO JMT
And....just happen to ware the exact same clothes as BG.And to prove it, he saw the white van!
MOO
Agree.If there's little evidence to convict RA (as some say), what evidence is there that someone or some ones commit these crimes?
Somebody else that RA didn't see, dressed like him, arriving and leaving at the same time? Driving a black car with identifying rims? With a propensity for chambering a cartridge and leaving one behind? With access to a bladed tool that would leave injuries hard to identify?
[I recall, when a document came out with redactions, trying to determine the word that followed bladed iirc. Too short to be knife. I don't recall now if anyone then guessed tool, but it sure fits with an unknown item which in turns fits with a boxcutter.]
DNA would be great. But it's not just RA's DNA that wasn't there, there wasn't any foreign DNA (just the hair that belonged to a female relative of Libby's and 3 of 72 hairs, without root, inconsistent with Abby and Libby, but not likely to yield helpful results -- we don't even know from where those hairs were recovered which may have had bearing on their investigative value). In any event, there just wasn't a ton of forensic evidence linking RA, but seeing as LE had five years to exhaust other avenues, I daresay there was even less to link anyone besides RA to the crime, try as though LE did.
And speculation isn't enough. Hence, the judge's rulings.
Besides, there is a walllllll of evidence implicating RA, despite no DNA, despite evidence lost to time.
The absence of his phone at a time he said he was using it. His self report. The timing. The gun. The bullet. The explanation for why there wasn't evidence of DNA-heavy SA, the outfit. The familiarity with and collecting of boxcutters.
Plus evidence as supplied by witnesses. The juveniles, BB, SC, AW, LG.
RA had the means, the method and the motive -- and he put himself there. Yes, we wish for more evidence always, but LE couldn't ignore the evidence they did have. And with it, they couldn't put anyone else ON the bridge and they couldn't get RA off of it.
The right man is being tried.
JMO
Unlike many, I see no conspiracy to railroad an innocent man. I see a man proven guilty BARD who has freely admitted his guilt. I believe him.MOYes, most people do trust in their abilities, until they give them reason not to. IMO
What was weird???I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m ready for some different topics in this trial to discuss. It got very weird in here not too long ago this evening & it seems like now there’s an uncomfortable silence. Hopefully tomorrow will bring some normalcy or even better a bit of closure. I’m pretty glad I’m not sitting up in a hotel in or near Delphi right now.
Exactly! The uncomfortable silence needs to be overcome. Liiby and Abby need us.I don’t know about anyone else, but I’m ready for some different topics in this trial to discuss. It got very weird in here not too long ago this evening & it seems like now there’s an uncomfortable silence. Hopefully tomorrow will bring some normalcy or even better a bit of closure. I’m pretty glad I’m not sitting up in a hotel in or near Delphi right now.
Yes.Unlike many, I see no conspiracy to railroad an innocent man. I see a man proven guilty BARD who has freely admitted his guilt. I believe him.MO
I think the judge disallowed the defense evidence to be presented at trial.Yes I am still patiently waiting for this so called evidence. I guess it’s like Odinism were they claim something but don’t have a single bit of evidence to back up their claims.
IMO
But in the 3 day pre-trial hearings it was testified to numerous times, there was none, no nexus was shown for the SODDIs. Speculation is not admissible evidence.I think the judge disallowed the defense evidence to be presented at trial.
JG’s ruling on “no nexus” will surely be challenged if RA is convicted. She has provided a laundry list of reasons for an appeal. MOOBut in the 3 day pre-trial hearings it was testified to numerous times, there was none, no nexus was shown for the SODDIs. Speculation is not admissible evidence.