Yes, they are active and in good standing
now. And as you are aware, at one time they were not and an investigation had to take place. Respectfully your request is a play on words. You are already aware of the Supreme Court ruling and know the defense team was reinstated.
However, they left their crime scene
photos unsecured and allowed access by a person
without clearance.
"The leak came when a former colleague of Rozzi’s — who has since been arrested and charged — allegedly took photographs of
evidence displayed on the table of a conference room in Rozzi’s law office."
"An
investigation into the leak “shows that Defense Counsel
failed to secure evidence and discovery materials in this case, specifically graphic crime scene photos, which were then distributed to the public and put on the internet in violation of the Court order dated February 17th, 2023, and evidence supports a conclusion that the disclosure was ongoing,” the filing says.
"Prosecutors said that the leaked photos have been devastating to the victims’ families."
"The multiple leaks
from the defense side “show a trend by Defense Counsels Brad Rozzi and Andrew Baldwin of not being completely honest with the Court, violating the Court’s Gag Order set in place to protect the integrity of the case, and failing to comply with the Protective Order put in place to protect the discovery in this case,” prosecutors’ filing said."
The Defense Team left their crime scene photos unsecured and allowed access by a person without clearance. Severe failure on the defenses part. Thus why after they were reinstated they.....
"
From that moment the defense team has reportedly taken steps to keep all Delphi-related items locked in a room or locked fireproof file cabinet to ensure no items are left unattended and unlocked."
"In the opinion, Molter also cited the reasons that the Indiana Supreme Court refused to appoint a new special judge. Molter stressed that nothing in the record suggested Gull’s decision to remove Allen’s attorneys “emerged from bias or prejudice against Allen.” Gull said that
she made the decision to protect his right to the effective assistance of counsel."
"Though she mistakenly hit defense counsel’s eject button instead of the case’s lockdown button,
she was right to try to get the situation under control quickly and decisively,” the opinion read. “Her efforts did not reflect any bias or prejudice, and Allen doesn’t identify anything she has done that demonstrates she isn’t impartial."
1.
https://search.app?link=https%3A%2F%2Ffox59.com%2Fnews%2Findycrime%2Findiana-supreme-court-releases-opinions-on-richard-allen-ruling%2F&utm_campaign=aga&utm_source=agsadl2%2Csh%2Fx%2Fgs%2Fm2%2F4
2.
3.
