GUILTY Abby & Libby - The Delphi Murders - Richard Allen Arrested - #219

[FrostedGlass]

Things of interest from the exhibit list:
I wonder how they calculated the number of inches/feet per step in Cecil's step counter. I would not have guessed L wore size 10 shoes. Now I finally understand how they got the arrival time; I always assumed KG came from the NE direction. She was coming from the west when she was seen on the HHS cam? SC was also driving east so she passed the Mears parking area and then saw muddy/bloody guy.

137: Lab #65 – report re: bag containing a black and white Nike size 10 collected
from Deer Creek
212: copy of Betsy Blair’s Fitbit data
217: still frame from HHS video showing Kelsi German’s car driving eastbound at
1:49 pm
219: still frame from HHS video showing Sarah Carbaugh’s car driving eastbound
at 3:56 pm
289: Video report re: foojackau account details and Google searches
UU: letter from Cheyenne to LE “about everything.”
AAA: document related to Brad Health’s work scans at 1:46 pm and 2:06 pm
BBB: photo of vehicle resembling the one Brad Health saw around 2:06 pm
CCC: 2/13/17 report written by Fire Chief Daryl Sterrett re: who attended the search
X: FBI 302 report re: Brad Weber’s statements on 2/19/2017
JJJ: list of Ford Focus hatchbacks registered in Cass, Carroll, Tippecanoe, and
White counties from 2011-2017 (not allowed)
X: medication logs

 

[legalmomma]

AB has filed a reply to the State’s response to the Motion to Produce and Preserve on behalf of Richard Allen.

Reply to State’s Response to Motion to Preserve Evidence

drive.google.com

 

[tlcya]

@Niner // @INfisherman

2/28/2025 - State's esponse To Motion To Preserve And Produce Specific Evidence

Response to Motion to Preserve Evidencepdf (1).pdf

drive.google.com

State's Exhibit 1 to above:

States Exhibit 1pdf.pdf

drive.google.com

State's Exhibit 2 to above:

States Exhibit 2pdf.pdf

drive.google.com

State's Exhibit 3 to above:

States Exhibit 3pdf.pdf

drive.google.com

State's Exhibit 4 to above:

States Exhibit 4pdf.pdf

drive.google.com

.

and there we have it. RA's supporters can now read for themselves the letters from RD that they were so convinced was exculpatory and cleared their boy. As with previous claims by attorney Baldwin, this RD "evidence" is nothing more than smoke and mirrors.

Hoping we can chuck this most recent steaming pile of poo into the same bucket the fauxdinist theory now resides in.

 

[tlcya]

AB has filed a reply to the State’s response to the Motion to Produce and Preserve on behalf of Richard Allen.

Reply to State’s Response to Motion to Preserve Evidence

drive.google.com

I have only this to say to Mr. Baldwin.

Sir, we can read. And now, thanks to your insistence, we have read the words of Ricci Davis. Those words are not evidence of an alternate suspect. Those words are only evidence of an inmate wanting some time shaved off his sentence and desirous of his five minutes of fame. Those words are evidence of Ricci's boredom, imagination, and finally evidence of your incompetence.

If this is the best you can offer your client it is no wonder he was so easily convicted of his crimes. Here is your move along now.

 

[Megnut]

AB has filed a reply to the State’s response to the Motion to Produce and Preserve on behalf of Richard Allen.

Reply to State’s Response to Motion to Preserve Evidence

drive.google.com

Just when you thought Frank was retired comes thee Frank's #5. What in the world? AB has resurrected prior Frank's motions that were already ruled on and dismissed. Recycled vomitus.

These letters IMPLICATE RA, not expulcate!

Tiresome.

JMO

 

[girlhasnoname]

and there we have it. RA's supporters can now read for themselves the letters from RD that they were so convinced was exculpatory and cleared their boy. As with previous claims by attorney Baldwin, this RD "evidence" is nothing more than smoke and mirrors.

Hoping we can chuck this most recent steaming pile of poo into the same bucket the fauxdinist theory now resides in.

Baldwin's unprofessional conduct and outright gross misconduct in this case has become second hand embarrassing.

Get a clue, get a grip on reality, you jumped the shark long ago pal. It's beyond comical at this point, bordering on scary and unhinged.

Perhaps 4 more days of laying up 'curled in the fetal position' will give you a chance to reflect and move along. Phone a friend or Professional Colleague and leave the Internet Cranks and the Due Proce$$ Gang behind.

JMO

 

[Vern]

AB has filed a reply to the State’s response to the Motion to Produce and Preserve on behalf of Richard Allen.

Reply to State’s Response to Motion to Preserve Evidence

drive.google.com

@Niner

@legalmomma, thank you!!

 

[girlhasnoname]

AB has filed a reply to the State’s response to the Motion to Produce and Preserve on behalf of Richard Allen.

Reply to State’s Response to Motion to Preserve Evidence

drive.google.com

Oh my, Baldwin was quick on the draw to file that overly long and footnoted to death reply. Embarrassing, unprofessional and non sensical doesn't begin to describe the response.

It lands right up there in the land of make believe fan fic and hysteria with the 1st Franks Motion.

JMO

 

[StarryStarryNight]

Oh my, Baldwin was quick on the draw to file that overly long and footnoted to death reply. Embarrassing, unprofessional and non sensical doesn't begin to describe the response.

It lands right up there in the land of make believe fan fic and hysteria with the 1st Franks Motion.

JMO

Seriously, Baldwin has completely lost his mind. I mean really someone who cares about him needs to remove him from the situation.
I jokingly have referred to him as delusional but I’m not joking now. In this most recent farce he is truly arguing…again…that the letters are exculpatory for RA. Sir, we have all read the letters, and they clearly implicate your client Richard Allen. The letters were not turned over to you because of that reason.
Baldwin needs to get over it, or get help.

 

[tlcya]

@Niner

03/03/2025 Amended Pleading Filed Twist Media LLC's Amended Motion to Intervene and to Compel Access to Public Trial Exhibits Filed By: TWIST MEDIA LLC File Stamp: 03/03/2025​

_Twist Media LLC's Amended Motion to Intervene and to Compel Access to Public Trial Exhibits.pdf

drive.google.com

ABC (Twisted) lost me when they asked for the photos of the bodies at the crime scene and the autopsy photos. Nope, I cannot support that. I hope JG denies this motion. JMO

 

[girlhasnoname]

Seriously, Baldwin has completely lost his mind. I mean really someone who cares about him needs to remove him from the situation.
I jokingly have referred to him as delusional but I’m not joking now. In this most recent farce he is truly arguing…again…that the letters are exculpatory for RA. Sir, we have all read the letters, and they clearly implicate your client Richard Allen. The letters were not turned over to you because of that reason.
Baldwin needs to get over it, or get help.

Could not agree more. He is on a personal vendetta against Judge Gull and Nick McL not in support of RA, and it's definitely not an emotionally healthy one either.

JMO

 

[INfisherman]

Jesus Baldwin give it a rest. Even if you had these letters they were inadmissible due to 3rd party ruling which included RL & KK. Boo hoo you lost & no need to embarrass yourself further. See you later on DD.

 

[StarryStarryNight]

Could not agree more. He is on a personal vendetta against Judge Gull and Nick McL not in support of RA, and it's definitely not an emotionally healthy one either.

JMO

He’s either lost his mind or lost his perspective, but you are right in that this has nothing to do with RA anymore. The escalating ridiculousness of his motions are approaching DECON Silly.
If RA or his wife or his mother or his daughter could possibly assemble one entire brain among themselves, they should tell Baldwin to shut up and let the appellate attorneys take over.

Edit: typo

 

[pseudo_hum]

IMO, AB must not have any other billable work.

 

[girlhasnoname]

IMO, AB must not have any other billable work.

Understandably IMO

 

[FrostedGlass]

I hope we get an answer to this question from the motion:
[snip]
"In the prosecution’s response to the defense’s motion to correct errors, in an apparent
attempt to discredit Ricci Davis, McLeland claims that he (McLeland) had
information that Ricci Davis had claimed that Ron Logan took batteries out of
Libby’s phone. This is curious because the prosecution has failed to produce any
document or videotape in which Ricci Davis makes such a claim. The defense has
found nothing. This leads to serious questions of where did McLeland learn of this
information? The defense is left with one of two possibilities: (1) McLeland has
additional Ricci Davis letters, reports or video from where he (McLeland) gained
that information, or (2) for reasons that are unknown, McLeland made up the story."
PG 11

Reply Defense.pdf

drive.google.com

 

[Vern]

I hope we get an answer to this question from the motion:
[snip]
"In the prosecution’s response to the defense’s motion to correct errors, in an apparent
attempt to discredit Ricci Davis, McLeland claims that he (McLeland) had
information that Ricci Davis had claimed that Ron Logan took batteries out of
Libby’s phone. This is curious because the prosecution has failed to produce any
document or videotape in which Ricci Davis makes such a claim. The defense has
found nothing. This leads to serious questions of where did McLeland learn of this
information? The defense is left with one of two possibilities: (1) McLeland has
additional Ricci Davis letters, reports or video from where he (McLeland) gained
that information, or (2) for reasons that are unknown, McLeland made up the story."
PG 11

Reply Defense.pdf

drive.google.com

I suspect it (that information) is from that ...

Door #3: Lie Detector Test

That RD was given and miserably failed and which the results of "huge fail" were indeed mentionned in the State's earlier Response. Info probably stated either in the pre-lim background info from RD or responses to the questions. IMO.

Not Discoverable material. Also, not unknown results to the defence as they actually included he results in their original motion ... but called that page "undecipherable" as they had no idea what they were actually looking at.

IMO.

.

 

[tlcya]

I hope we get an answer to this question from the motion:
[snip]
"In the prosecution’s response to the defense’s motion to correct errors, in an apparent
attempt to discredit Ricci Davis, McLeland claims that he (McLeland) had
information that Ricci Davis had claimed that Ron Logan took batteries out of
Libby’s phone. This is curious because the prosecution has failed to produce any
document or videotape in which Ricci Davis makes such a claim. The defense has
found nothing. This leads to serious questions of where did McLeland learn of this
information? The defense is left with one of two possibilities: (1) McLeland has
additional Ricci Davis letters, reports or video from where he (McLeland) gained
that information, or (2) for reasons that are unknown, McLeland made up the story."
PG 11

Reply Defense.pdf

drive.google.com

the Reply to the MTCE clearly states that LE interviewed RD and that RD made those statements during that interview. Since the "evidence" is not exculpatory no matter how Baldwin wishes it were, there are two possible answers to Mr. Baldwin's "serious" questions about those statements.

1. LE's report of their interview of RD is buried somewhere in the discovery defense were provided but were too busy writing endless Fauxdinist Frank memos to bother to read. Or
2. it wasn't in the discovery provided by the state because - let's circle back, IT WASN'T EXCULPATORY and in fact, the information RD provided was INCULPATORY to their client and patently and proven to be patently FALSE.

Baldwin isn't new and this isn't rocket science. His feigned outrage grows old.

 

[INfisherman]

Baldwin’s got some stones making allegations of people making things up, particularly when his latest star witness Reecee cup suggests AB was hinting at it himself.

 

[mrjitty]

the Reply to the MTCE clearly states that LE interviewed RD and that RD made those statements during that interview. Since the "evidence" is not exculpatory no matter how Baldwin wishes it were, there are two possible answers to Mr. Baldwin's "serious" questions about those statements.

1. LE's report of their interview of RD is buried somewhere in the discovery defense were provided but were too busy writing endless Fauxdinist Frank motions to bother to read. Or
2. it wasn't in the discovery provided by the state because - let's circle back, IT WASN'T EXCULPATORY and in fact, the information RD provided was INCULPATORY to their client and patently and proven to be patently FALSE.

Baldwin isn't new and this isn't rocket science. His feigned outrage grows old.

I have seen this before where a defence lawyer gets obsessed with a case and ploughs decades in to an obviously guilty client. Feels like he has got deeply redpilled somehow. Maybe he delved too deeply into Odinsim and ended up convincing himself of it. Or maybe he came to believe the judge really was out to get him. Bizarre.

IMO