I meant the sketches, but what’s an IPA?Which one? The sketches or IPAS?
Nope.Will we be able to watch the trial?
I don't know exactly. Here's what my search found: Indiana Protection and Advocacy Services Commission (“IPAS”).I meant the sketches, but what’s an IPA?
The only IPA I know of refers to beer. I don't think that is it in this case.I meant the sketches, but what’s an IPA?
Motion In Limine Filed Motion in Limine - sketches.pdf Filed By: State of Indiana File Stamp: 10/14/2024 |
IMO, other witnesses probably assisted with one of the sketches, not just one person.I want to know how close Sarah Carbaugh (first sketch) was to the muddy/bloody man she saw.
We know Betsy Blair (second sketch) was approximately 50 feet away from the man she saw standing on platform One on the High bridge. Was the man even looking in her direction or looking down into the creek? Did she head to the High Bridge and just stand there idle looking at the man or did she just glance in the man's direction for a brief second and then turn around and continue her walk? I think the latter.
Neither woman wanted to contribute to the sketch but were convinced by LE to do so.
I want to know the dates of when these women were first questioned by LE and when they provided the information from the sketches.
The fact they both witnessed a white male with a medium build (that cannot rule out RA) is just another piece of circumstantial evidence against him on top of all of the direct evidence and the voluminous other circumstantial evidence against him.
He was determined? I want to know what RA has to say on that subject. I also don't think it has to be RA redressing Abby. She could have grabbed the only pants lying there, if he told her to put something on. It's interesting in all the FM's, the PCA, the pics of clothes in the creek, Abby's skinny jeans are not mentioned. AJMOIn my own, personal opinion, If I’m a juror, I’m going to wonder how and why, if a SA was the motive, but RA was interrupted, he took the time to redress Abby and stage the crime scene the way it was staged. If he was interrupted, wouldn’t he have just high-tailed it out of there? This my opinion.
As always, JMO IMO MOOOO
I think it’s likely this is not human hair. If it was, there would likely be roots attached (pulled out in a struggle), which would lend itself to more advanced DNA results.
That would potentially allow for a CODIS upload, genetic genealogy, and the standard comparison DNA of any suspects.
Even rootless hair can now be analyzed this way.
So if this was human hair, then I think there’s a good chance this case would have been solved long before it was.
I'm thinking it will all be about what questions they ask family members and why. I have no confidence these lawyers will show a bit of genuine care for the families while questioning them. "Genuine" is the key word for me in that sentence. The leopard and his spots won't change. AJMORsbm
This is my own, personal opinion, but I think It will all be dependent on what has already come out, if clarifications need to be made or contradictions cleared up. The jury may actually welcome it, in my opinion.
We will have to wait and see.
As always, JMO.
And wouldn't that be a good reason for the D to put MP on their witness list. BP, DG and Kelsei need to testify for the timeline, MP was at work. Let's remove all of Libby's Indiana family from the courtroom. Just my honest opinion. I trust this D will think of everything, they're so very zealous. Also MOWill BP and MP be able to watch the trial since they are on the witness list? Not sure how that works.
It’s only expected to last a month and the jury will be sequestered, which is rare.4 (or 5) alternates seems like too few.
It would be terrible if the trial falls apart over jury number.
Jmo