Absolutely agree. It is another more piece of circunstancial evidence and coincidence.If this were any other case on Websleuths, one without all the baggage and tribalism over prosecution vs. defense, we would be all over this nugget of information as incredibly telling.
Kevin say he was surprised when in the cross-examination the prosecutor didn't object when Auger asked if there anything in the devices that connected RA to Abby and Libby but a minutes later he understand why the prosecutor didn't. Mcleland wanted to talk abut Allen's devices and when the witness said the only one missing was the one from 2017, the jury seemed to react to that according to Kevin.