- Joined
- Mar 16, 2014
- Messages
- 5,687
- Reaction score
- 30,865
So far, the State has nothing imo. The witnesses don't even seem to have described anyone who resembled RA!! MOOONothing, nada, zilch. IMO
So far, the State has nothing imo. The witnesses don't even seem to have described anyone who resembled RA!! MOOONothing, nada, zilch. IMO
Per the link…during the original 2017 interview
“Dulin testified that Allen met him in the parking lot and they spoke for around ten minutes. He did not record the interview, but took notes on the back of the lead sheet.
He confirmed that his name was Richard Allen, not Richard Allen Whiteman.…”
“Dulin said he collected Allen’s cell phone information, including the MEID number— a specific identifying number for each cell phone.”
“Dulin said he typed up his notes, adding Allen’s drivers license and DMV photo and submitted the packet to detectives. He was not assigned to do a further follow up.”
Makes one wonder what other things weren’t looked at with human eyes.Huge volumes of information is a perpetual problem in investigations that garner a lot of public attention.
Computerisation helped with problems caused by the tons of paper generated in inquires like the Yorkshire Ripper, but any system is vulnerable at the point of information coming in.
This action, the surname was actually the street name, and at some point, it was labelled 'cleared'. That makes it invisible until someone actually looks at that report with human eyes and goes, wait a minute.
MOO
Ever since that keepsake box with the bullet was revealed, I wondered.Ok, so the fact that the round in the keepsake box was the same brand as the one found at the scene, is obviously interesting. I figured it was just another round of the same caliber, of the (different) brand found in his weapon, and in magazines.
Horribly written, but if you combine this with the reporting that the keepsake round matches the crime scene round, then we're talking about a .40 Winchester. The other ammunition they seized (one was chambered if I recall from the documents), was Blazer.Thanks for this little detail. I've been saying for quite some time that ammo. brand found at the scene was unique, and that it matches in this instance isn't terribly surprising to me. Often with 'carry' ammo., a person uses the same brand for years.
I'd suspect more testimony relative to he ammo in the magazines, the chamber of the sig. etc. that were obtained during the search.
Who knows.Makes one wonder what other things weren’t looked at with human eyes.
IMO
No clue- same link says that DD was questioned about why he threw out his hand written notes- which makes me wonder how the hand written notes and wrong name persisted until 2022 - I’m obviously missing something- but it’s rather confusing to me how this lead was not followed up on- eye witnesses who placed himself at the scene- someone marked it cleared and it was DD it doesn’t sound like- mooI'm wondering if this must be what the tip narrative is about for February 16th, 2017.
Seems like they may have just simply crossed each other's paths that day and Richard Allen complied by giving different forms of ID to verify himself.
Standard procedure maybe.
What is interesting to me as that he did this after the release of those images from LE not before.
JMO MOO JMT
One reason I am very resistant to conspiracy theories is because humans screw up too much. We are creatures prone to mistakes.Who knows.
I think that there are things missed in most endeavours. We can't switch to relying on algorithms but neither can we assume that just because a person looked at something or actioned it that nothing was missed, because humans are fallible. The stakes are just higher when the subject is homicide.
MOO
One reason I am very resistant to conspiracy theories is because humans screw up too much. We are creatures prone to mistakes.
But we also can correct mistakes.
jmo
Wow!At one point while Holeman and Allen were in the car, the lieutenant asked if Allen wanted to fill out a form for items damaged in the search. Holeman said Allen responded, “It doesn’t matter. It’s over.”
I don't find that question unreasonable since SC didn't speak to LE until 3 weeks after the murders per testimony yesterday. That is really odd to me. I also noted she said she spoke more about blood in her last mtg with LE because they focused more on that. It feels like she was being led to a degree by the police as to what to say in her interview and testimony. Her story also changed from a tan coat to match what BG was wearing.... I think its a great that the D is questioning things about that particular witness. MOOWhat the heck are his questions about SC about? So the defense’s tactic is to just assume everything everybody testifies to is made up? “…she didn’t SEE anyone that day?”?
How preposterous. That’s just insulting.
These questions from the people who brought you the Franks fantasy.
That’s the exact opposite reaction he should have. Hell, even guilty people are combative and deny it.Wow!
I thought the exact same as you.Interesting jury question!
My interpretation: if RA didn't remember which direction he took, then how can defense accuse Mullin of lying?
If RA said 'I went east', then Mullin would be lying. But since RA said he didn't know, then Mullin was piecing his movements together, using the words RA did state.
To me, that question is even smarter than whatever the Prosecution said in redirect.
JMO
I wonder if this counts as one of the 60+ confessions or if this is a freebie."It doesn't matter. It's over." These are the words Allen said to Jerry Holeman as police searched his residence on Ocober 13th, 2022.
lol. More confusion about the bullet.I have more info from the Carroll County Comet that adds to what @MassGuy posted above:
"It doesn't matter. It's over." These are the words Allen said to Jerry Holeman as police searched his residence on October 13th, 2022. Holeman told Allen that if there was any damage to anything inside his home he would be reimbursed. Allen then said those words. When the search was completed Holeman again reiterated that if anything was damaged, Allen could fill out paperwork to get reimbursed and Allen repeated that statement a second time. This was before his arrest later that month.
A tense day in court as the defense questioned Steve Mullin about Allen's car being seen on 300N on Feraury 13th, 2017. Mullin insisted, as did others, that the car was traveling on the road just as Allen had said to him.
The day of the search warrant, items collected including 12 phones, nearly 30 knives, and 4 box cutters.
Inside an ornate box, investigators found a letter to Allen from his mother, some photos, and a hollow point bullet, Smith & Wesson brand, similar to the one found at the crime scene between the bodies of Libby and Abby.
Source: 6.7K views · 162 reactions | Carroll County Comet was live. | By Carroll County Comet | Facebook
It's fantastic watching the story unfold!So far, the State has nothing imo. The witnesses don't even seem to have described anyone who resembled RA!! MOOO
lol. More confusion about the bullet.
A .40 by the full name is .40 S&W. I doubt that’s the brand though.
So we’ll need more info on the round the keepsake box and how it compares to the crime scene one.