It seems like the worst thing they could find on his google history was some horror movie searches from 2022. I couldn't help but notice, he didn't google things like how to wipe a device, or how to remove blood stains, where to buy a new jacket etc... Doesn't seem like he had anything that would connect him to the crime or the kids on whatever devices of his they removed from the home / in his google history... no dna, no transfer evidence... nothing it seems that links him to this at all really. Seems he went for a walk on a bridge on the day someone killed the kids. MOOOOO.
"
Stacy Bozinovski told the jury she tested items from the crime scene, including clothing from Abby and Libby, skin cells from under their fingertips, blood from the crime scene and the unspent bullet found between the victims’ bodies. While she found DNA from both girls on most of the crime scene samples, there was no DNA from Allen.
There was DNA from an unknown male found at the crime scene – but Bozinovski testified this was not unusual and could have come from the girls’ environment. There was no DNA evidence of sexual assault, she testified, according to WTHR."
2nd quote:
'Asked about hair samples found at the crime scene, Bozinovski said the state was not testing them now. “But this is the time,” replied defense attorney Jennifer Auger said. “Richard Allen is on trial now!”
Those searches were years after the murders, and things like wiping a device, removing blood stains, etc, would have been lost to time.
He did go for a walk that day, by his own account under the influence of alcohol. He claimed to have been on his phone checking stock quotes, yet his phone was not transmitting with a tower. Why would he lie?
He said he was on the trail at the same time the killer would have had to have been there, before drastically changing his timeline in a transparent attempt to sell the story that it couldn’t have been him.
He said he was dressed similarly to BG.
Witnesses saw a man dressed similarly to BG.
He saw witnesses who sound very similar to the witnesses who saw him.
Allen did not see BG, yet multiple other people seem to have seen him, and their timelines make it more than plausible that they did.
A cartridge matching his gun was found at the scene.
He mentioned using a box cutter and disposing it in a CVS dumpster. The wounds on the girls appear to be of the type you’d expect to be made by that weapon.
The crime scene was chaotic, which can tell you a lot about a killer. Richard Allen couldn’t possibly be a better fit in that regard.
Those searches unequivocally prove that he was familiar with the Delphi case, yet he apparently didn’t know where that image of BG had come from. Instead of simply saying that image was not of him, he bizarrely equivocated, saying that it couldn’t be him if the girls took it.
He was just playing stupid.
As for the lack of DNA, the fact that the girls were murdered is not in dispute. Someone killed them and managed not to leave DNA, regardless of if one thinks Allen is innocent or guilty.
How? Allen tells us.
He used a box cutter, which would have made it much less likely that he would have cut himself (as opposed to a knife).
He did not commit rape, as he said he was disrupted.
The murder was committed outdoors, and the elements destroy DNA.
To say that nothing connects him to this simply isn’t true.
