- Joined
- Sep 11, 2024
- Messages
- 2,198
- Reaction score
- 26,534
Let me see if I can access them.Thanks for that. I've lost track of some of the motions docs. Have you found the exhibits that go with the State's answer to the defense MTCE?
Let me see if I can access them.Thanks for that. I've lost track of some of the motions docs. Have you found the exhibits that go with the State's answer to the defense MTCE?
Here is the full state’s response to the MTCE. I manually added in the last 3 pictures of the cell phone so everything is in one PDF.Thanks for that. I've lost track of some of the motions docs. Have you found the exhibits that go with the State's answer to the defense MTCE?
Thank you. I have it but I don't know if it's by an approved source so I didn't post it.Here is the full state’s response to the MTCE. I manually added in the last 3 pictures of the cell phone so everything is in one PDF.
State's Response to Motion to Correct Error.pdf
drive.google.com
Please let me know you have it FG, as I would prefer to take it offline in a day or so. Thank you.
@NinerHere is the full state’s response to the MTCE. I manually added in the last 3 pictures of the cell phone so everything is in one PDF.
State's Response to Motion to Correct Error.pdf
drive.google.com
Please let me know you have it FG, as I would prefer to take it offline in a day or so. Thank you.
No problem.Thank you. I have it but I don't know if it's by an approved source so I didn't post it.
I'm especially interested in #7. I assume you've read it.
The Physical Discovery Release to both sets of attys. I thought all discovery that the second set of attys had was to be returned to Nick and then back to B&R. I don't understand why S&L are still receiving discovery.
There is a lot of interesting stuff in that filing and names I've never heard of.
No problem.@Niner
States Response to MTCE with their exhibits attached in linked post.
Thank you @INfisherman !!
I believe to them it's called the 'Defense Du Jour'. Read the room Rozzi & Baldwin, it's over. Take what's left of your humanity and civility (if there is any) and go back to defending the ilk you're used to. This was way out of your league.The other thing that really troubles me is that Ausbrook was on Motta's show after the 3 day hearing claiming the D had proof that Libbys phone was off, and turned back on at 3am whereas now he says it was always on with headphones in for hours.
Nowhere has he, Motta or Baldwin & Rozzi ever accounted for this massive change in theory.
Let alone the idea that after all this Odinist stuff, RL is the real killer
Now in court you can have inconsistent theories and the jury may never know. But in real life, obviously you can't do this without revealing that one of your theories was either wrong or you never believed it in the first place.
So which?
MOO
@Niner
States Response to MTCE with their exhibits attached in linked post.
Thank you @INfisherman !!
If RA would get a new trial, IMO, there's a chance Scremin and Lebrato might come back on. I would be ok with that, as well as them getting this discovery.No problem.
Regarding exhibit #7, it’s possible NM sent the list of discovery items to both sets of attorneys so each can see the discovery is the same & NM isn’t withholding anything upon receipt, prior to returning to AB & BR. It might be a simple courtesy or SOP.
MOO
I think they have a much greater chance of coming back to represent RA than RA has a chance at getting a retrial based on the MTCE.If RA would get a new trial, IMO, there's a chance Scremin and Lebrato might come back on. I would be ok with that, as well as them getting this discovery.
I think this is a good theory. DG called Libby around 3:15(I cannot remember exact time) when he was a few minutes away from the Mears trailhead to pick them up. He probably would have told Libby to start walking back towards the trailhead parking lot so he did not have to get out of the car and could just pick them up and leave.Came across fact about the P226 that suports the unintentional ejection of a round.
The P226 does not have a safety. It has a a cocking/decocking lever, so basically the gun has no safety at all.
MOO RA wanted to use gun for coercion only, so if he lost track of where he was, racking again (which ejected an unspent round) makes sense.
MOO it's possible he remained there for a while looking for that ejected round but it had been stepped point down into the dirt making it virtually unfindable, then hearing DG made him leave.
I haven't seen even 1 prediction that Gull will do anything except deny the MTCE without a hearing based on her history of hearing the defense team's motions.I think they have a much greater chance of coming back to represent RA than RA has a chance at getting a retrial based on the MTCE.
Anyone would be an improvement over his current trial attorneys or advocates.
JMO
She might take the opportunity to tell them face to face but I wouldn’t be surprised either way.I haven't seen even 1 prediction that Gull will do anything except deny the MTCE without a hearing based on her history of hearing the defense team's motions.
ETA: I don't think a lot of folks would like S&L much better than B&R.
01/31/2025 Case Opened as a New Filing |
02/05/2025 Order Issued Ban on Cellular Telephones, Pagers, and Other Electronic Devices Judicial Officer: Gull, Frances C Order Signed: 01/31/2025 |
IIRC the wind was from the west that day, so sound carried well from the trail and MHB to the CS but not vice versa.I think this is a good theory. DG called Libby around 3:15(I cannot remember exact time) when he was a few minutes away from the Mears trailhead to pick them up. He probably would have told Libby to start walking back towards the trailhead parking lot so he did not have to get out of the car and could just pick them up and leave.
When he could not reach Libby on her cell phone, he arrived and began looking for them on the trails by going down the main trail to the bridge and then the other trail close by that goes towards the bridge but ends by the water near the bridge. I think it would take at least 10 minutes round trip for both of those searches. Then DG gets back to the Mears trailhead area and runs into flannel shirt guy. Since flannel shirt guy was coming from the Freedom bridge area and there is not as much area to go off into the woods between Mears trailhead and Freedom bridge trailhead, he assumes flannel shirt guy's response that he has not seen them on the trail is adequate.
Then DG walks back toward the area he probably feels they are in, the Monon High Bridge itself, due to Libby and her sister liking that area the best from exploring it during previous trips. Whether DG crossed the Monon High Bridge or not I do not know, but I think he probably got to at least the beginning of the bridge and maybe started yelling,
"Liiiiiiiiiiiiiiibbbbbbbbbbbbyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!" (or Liberty however he referred to her)
I wonder if someone were standing at the crime scene if they would be able to hear it. I can only guess the killer would not use the trails to walk back to their car if they felt a family member was looking for the girls on the trails themselves.
Until we know about the exact wording of Richard Allen's confession to Dr. Walla, I can only guess if that yelling for Libby is what scared him to leave the crime scene and that he would have walked towards the road to be seen by SC at 3:57pm walking alongside the road. I still cannot figure out how he was not seen walking back to his car after the crime, but at that time people were probably not paying attention as the focus was on looking for Abby and Libby. I think that theory makes sense.
The link above is no longer active - file has been removed.Here is the full state’s response to the MTCE. I manually added in the last 3 pictures of the cell phone so everything is in one PDF.
State's Response to Motion to Correct Error.pdf
drive.google.com
Please let me know you have it FG, as I would prefer to take it offline in a day or so. Thank you.
Uploading linked doc just for purposes of those viewing who want to see it.Jude Gull got serious about electronics in the courtroom. This can be downloaded.
02D05-2501-CB-000024
01/31/2025 Case Opened as a New Filing 02/05/2025 Order Issued
Ban on Cellular Telephones, Pagers, and Other Electronic Devices
Judicial Officer:
Gull, Frances C
Order Signed:
01/31/2025
< > Then DG gets back to the Mears trailhead area and runs into flannel shirt guy. Since flannel shirt guy was coming from the Freedom bridge area and there is not as much area to go off into the woods between Mears trailhead and Freedom bridge trailhead, he assumes flannel shirt guy's response that he has not seen them on the trail is adequate.
Then DG walks back toward the area he probably feels they are in, the Monon High Bridge itself, due to Libby and her sister liking that area the best from exploring it during previous trips. Whether DG crossed the Monon High Bridge or not I do not know, but I think he probably got to at least the beginning of the bridge and maybe started yelling, < >
Nice recall. FSG would be David McCain, IIRC. He testified for the defense & said he came from MHB & was leaving via Mears entrance around 4. He didn’t testify to hearing anyone yelling.For the sake of clarity of facts, you have a link to suggest DG walked anywhere near Monon High Bridge that day? I recall FSG was coming from that very direction, not from Freedom Bridge area and so that’s why DG didn’t go any further to check it out at the time. I think you’ve got it backwards.