I think the Dateline episode would have been better if they had, in hand, the discovery they asked for. Judge Gull said in her recent order Dateline sent an
email on Jan 8, 2025 requesting discovery. I wonder if the email included plans to have a Dateline segment. The fact that she waited to issue her order until 2 days before the segment was scheduled to air makes me wonder about her timing.
MOO
drive.google.com
@
FrostedGlass
Okay, agreeing that Dateline episode MAY have been "better if they had, in hand, the discovery they asked for" but not sure as I have not watched it yet.
Unusual or delayed TIMING of judge's order, as OP suggests?
Conviction on Nov. 11, 2024 & sentencing on Dec. 20, 2024.
If Dateline NBC was planning to air a Delphi trial follow up (could there be a question about that), say ~ Feb 21, is there a reason for failing to request the Public Trial Exhibits until either -
- the initial Jan. 8 EMAIL request to the court, or
- the actual Feb. 3 MOTION filed w court,
just a couple weeks before the planned air-date?
Without reviewing statutory specifics of IN. "Access to Public Records" act and application to state court records, I gotta think the folks involved w Dateline NBC production made some ASSumptions in phrasing these requests.
From ¶4 of Judge Gull's order re NBC's requested "priority requests" seems clear to me, that NBC did not cite authority which was/could have been a basis for such a demand.
From the order's findings (¶9 & other ¶'s) about the requests being "overbroad, vague and not specific," it seems that some of the requests were rather hastily drafted.
Personally I don't think there was necessarily a deliberate delay and do not know of anything suspicious about the timing of the judge's order.
Reminds me of an old saying

:
Poor planning on your [Dateline NBC's] part does NOT constitute an emergency on my [the Court's] part.
jmo
_________________________________
*IN. statute.
Browse Indiana Code | Chapter 3 - ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS for free on Casetext
casetext.com