Rbbm
Good point!
(Except I'm still confused. If LE had an extra number, they would have called it and identified RA during the investigation, separate from the DD tip.)
But it's good to remember that things are often left out of trials. By suppression. By stipulation.
Recent case, conspiracy to commit murder, defendant's phone is never mentioned at trial. Defense got it thrown out on a warrant technicality.
If we ever get transcripts if the trial, it's gonna be voluminous, better then nothing but a real challenge to re-imagine what testimony was like in the original 3D. We may never know what didn't make it to trial (again, technicalities, suppression, stipulation).
Far as we know, they're was next to testimony as to RA's movements that day. I've grown accustomed to that. CAST reports from defendants' cellphones and vehicles, generating a timeline of defendants' movements leading up to and following crimes.
Case continues to come down to the simple fact that the defendant put himself on the bridge at the time if the crime and nothing -- no one, no data, no testimony, nothing -- could get him off of it. And nothing put him anywhere else.
JMO
JMO