- Joined
- Sep 14, 2017
- Messages
- 11,250
- Reaction score
- 113,018
Definitely.This woman deserves a badge.
Definitely.This woman deserves a badge.
Exactly !!But he never did it prior to the release of those images.
Why would anyone, if guilty knowing images existed, volunteer information that they were at the crime location that day.
JMO MOO JMT
Richard Allen said he was seen by three girls.So far I haven't seen any witness in the trial point out that BG is RA or RA is BG so it is hard to say who was seen that day or not.
If I knew images existed out there of me on the news and what have you I would be keeping a low profile.
With this trial, however, it is still early days yet.
JMO MOO JMT
23 phones or 23 devices?
I am keeping an open mind... as of right now though, I could see this going either way. mooooThat's not at all how it went down. They had him saying he was on the bridge, and didn't DISCOVER they had that until YEARS later.
Once they did discover that, they conducted a follow up interview that gave them the probable cause to get a search warrant. They believed those girls had seen BG, he said he had seen the same girls, and was dressed like BG. That made it probable that BG and RA were one in the same.
That's enough to get a search warrant, and ultimately "why bother, it's all over." It's sure starting to look that way.
On 2/16/2017 RA didn't know they had a video or his voice on that video.
think Allen saw the photo, and was trying to get ahead of it.
Would have loved to have been a fly on the wall when RA seen that image for the first time.
he said 'If this image was taken with the girls' camera, there's no way it could be me."
I don’t think there’s going to be more. It appears it was tested, and they struck out.What! Okay, so the Carhartt jacket found at RA's home did not link to the crime scene...
Is there more than one Carhartt jacket owned by RA?
Will there be more about this jacket during trial tomorrow?
Re: Sheriff Liggett testimony:
Also found during the search of Allen’s home was a blue Carhartt jacket.
During cross-examination, Allen’s attorneys asked Liggett point-blank if any items sent to the lab, such as the blue Carhartt jacket taken from Allen’s home, were found to have DNA evidence linking Allen to the crime scene.
Liggett said, “no.”
Exactly !!
Why would they, but yet RA did
He recognized them from Rite Aid and presumed they recognized him.Richard Allen said he was seen by three girls.
The question posed was why would he come forward if he knew there was video. Because he knew he had been seen. By the three girls he mentioned. He had no idea if they recognized him or not. Their actual recognition of him has little bearing on it. If they did recognize him, which he had no way of knowing either way at the time, it would look pretty bad if he did not come forward.
JMO
I have been wondering something similar - wouldn’t we think some of that would come out to family, friends and co-workers?The more that comes out about how RA reacted to various points of being investigated the more convinced I become that they have the right man. He seems to swing wildly back and forth between insisting he has nothing to do with this, almost disassociating completely from his (whether you think he is guilty or not) undeniably close proximity to the murders and a very defeated, helpless to control himself, I-deserve-everything-that-happens-to-me mindset. Almost like he feels like he can’t control what he says at points. Somebody who feels helpless in the face of their impulses and prone to extreme emotional highs and lows is exactly the kind of person that makes sense to have killed Abby and Libby given from what we know of the very violent, seemingly chaotic and somewhat perplexing (i.e the sticks + redressing of Abby) crime scene. JMO of course
I’m curious what “keepsake box” means here. In my house I have some cute boxes that could be called keepsake boxes but they’re actually “put it in there because I don’t know what else to do with it right now” boxes.
There's no reason why RA could not have brought more than one Carhartt jacket. He may have gotten rid of the one with blood evidence on it and bought a new one in the same color. JMO,What! Okay, so the Carhartt jacket found at RA's home did not link to the crime scene...
Is there more than one Carhartt jacket owned by RA?
Will there be more about this jacket during trial tomorrow?
Re: Sheriff Liggett testimony:
Also found during the search of Allen’s home was a blue Carhartt jacket.
During cross-examination, Allen’s attorneys asked Liggett point-blank if any items sent to the lab, such as the blue Carhartt jacket taken from Allen’s home, were found to have DNA evidence linking Allen to the crime scene.
Liggett said, “no.”
If DD gave the report from his 2017 interview to detectives- within days of the murders- they had the information from the beginning- before 50,000 bits of information and databases of leads- and countless boxes- they shouldn’t have had to discover it years later - if it had been properly documented and followed up upon- in my opinionThat's not at all how it went down. They had him saying he was on the bridge, and didn't DISCOVER they had that until YEARS later.
Richard Allen said he was seen by three girls.
The question posed was why would he come forward if he knew there was video. Because he knew he had been seen. By the three girls he mentioned. He had no idea if they recognized him or not. Their actual recognition of him has little bearing on it. If they did recognize him, which he had no way of knowing either way at the time, it would look pretty bad if he did not come forward.
JMO
It reminds me of Scott Peterson. Everyone asked why he placed himself at the exact location where his wife's body was found. The reason was that he thought that someone saw him at the marina, so he admitted being there, but denied putting her body there.Richard Allen said he was seen by three girls.
The question posed was why would he come forward if he knew there was video. Because he knew he had been seen. By the three girls he mentioned. He had no idea if they recognized him or not. Their actual recognition of him has little bearing on it. If they did recognize him, which he had no way of knowing either way at the time, it would look pretty bad if he did not come forward.
JMO
Or maybe he had a couple or a few, and one just never got put back in the wardrobe after February 2017. If you have more than one of something, it's probably easier for a family member not to notice if something goes missing. If it was his only coat, and one day it's gone and he's wearing a brand new one, that would be more likely to be noticed.There's no reason why RA could not have brought more than one Carhartt jacket. He may have gotten rid of the one with blood evidence on it and bought a new one in the same color. JMO,